It appears as if an OTDR knows not its A from its E, when testing G.652D Non-Dispersion-Shifted Fibre (NDSF), connected to the following fibre types: (a) G.655D or G.656, variants of non-zero dispersion-shifted fibre (NZDSF) and (b) G.657A bend insensitive fibre. It is a difference in backscatter just before and just after the splice that confuses an OTDR:
a) The issue here is mode field diameters (MFDs). When splicing G.652D (smaller MFD) onto G.655/6 (larger MFD) a negative contribution (gainer) is incorrectly reported and G.655/6 onto G.652D reports an exaggerated loss… e.g. a real splice of 0.05 dB could bi-directionally measure -0.10 dB and +0.20 dB. These phenomena are well known, and operating procedures calling for bi-directional OTDR measurements and averaging the results has been a time-honoured tradition. More importantly though, using either Fujikura SM or NZ splicing modes, averaged dB splice losses as low as 0.04 to 0.02 are accomplishable without any obvious effort.
I recently subjected my field (who all happened to be novices) to splicing G.652D onto G.657A, using Auto, SM and NZ splice modes and below, the outcome:
Auto, SM and NZ modes all deliver decent-looking splices, with the true loss being the average of bi-directional measurements. NZ proved to be superior by a whisker. Experienced splice techs are predisposed not to like Auto-mode because for them, it is intolerably slow. Note that while BI G.657.A-compliant fibres are required to be backward compatible with G.652.D - G.657.B-compliant fibres (called bend-tolerant), are not.